Nuclear Accident at three mile island

March, 1979: Nuclear accident at Three Mile Island

At 4 a.m. on 28 March 1979, the worst accident in the history of the U.S. nuclear power industry begins when a pressure valve in the Unit-2 reactor at Three Mile Island fails to close. Cooling water, contaminated with radiation, drained from the open valve into adjoining buildings, and the core began to dangerously overheat.

The Three Mile Island nuclear power plant was built in 1974 on a sandbar on Pennsylvania's Susquehanna River, just 10 miles downstream from the state capitol in Harrisburg. In 1978, a second state-of-the-art reactor began operating on Three Mile Island, which was lauded for generating affordable and reliable energy in a time of energy crises.

After the cooling water began to drain out of the broken pressure valve on the morning of 28 March 1979, emergency cooling pumps automatically went into operation. Left alone, these safety devices would have prevented the development of a larger crisis. However, human operators in the control room misread confusing and contradictory readings and shut off the emergency water system. The reactor was also shut down, but residual heat from the fission process was still being released. By early morning, the core had heated to over 4,000 degrees, just 1,000 degrees short of meltdown. In the meltdown scenario, the core melts, and deadly radiation drifts across the countryside, fatally sickening a potentially great number of people.

As the plant operators struggled to understand what had happened, the contaminated water was releasing radioactive gases throughout the plant. The radiation levels, though not immediately life-threatening, were dangerous, and the core cooked further as the contaminated water was contained and precautions were taken to protect the operators. Shortly after 8 a.m., word of the accident leaked to the outside world. The plant's parent company, Metropolitan Edison, downplayed the crisis and claimed that no radiation had been detected off plant grounds, but the same day inspectors detected slightly increased levels of radiation nearby as a result of the contaminated water leak. Pennsylvania Governor Dick Thornburgh considered calling an evacuation.

Finally, at about 8 p.m., plant operators realised they needed to get water moving through the core again and restarted the pumps. The temperature began to drop, and pressure in the reactor was reduced. The reactor had come within less than an hour of a complete meltdown. More than half the core was destroyed or molten, but it had not broken its protective shell, and no radiation was escaping. The crisis was apparently over.

Two days later, however, on 30 March, a bubble of highly flammable hydrogen gas was discovered within the reactor building. The bubble of gas was created two days before when exposed core materials reacted with super-heated steam. On 28 March, some of this gas had exploded, releasing a small amount of radiation into the atmosphere. At that time, plant operators had not registered the explosion, which sounded like a ventilation door closing. After the radiation leak was discovered on March 30, residents were advised to stay indoors. Experts were uncertain if the hydrogen bubble would create further meltdown or possibly a giant explosion, and as a precaution Governor Thornburgh advised "pregnant women and pre-school age children to leave the area within a five-mile radius of the Three Mile Island facility until further notice." This led to the panic the governor had hoped to avoid; within days, more than 100,000 people had fled the surrounding towns.

On 1 April, President Jimmy Carter arrived at Three Mile Island to inspect the plant. Carter, a trained nuclear engineer, had helped dismantle a damaged Canadian nuclear reactor while serving in the U.S. Navy. His visit achieved its aim of calming local residents and the nation. That afternoon, experts agreed that the hydrogen bubble was not in danger of exploding. Slowly, the hydrogen was bled from the system as the reactor cooled.

At the height of the crisis, plant workers were exposed to unhealthy levels of radiation, but no one outside Three Mile Island had their health adversely affected by the accident. Nonetheless, the incident greatly eroded the public's faith in nuclear power. The unharmed Unit-1 reactor at Three Mile Island, which was shut down during the crisis, did not resume operation until 1985. Cleanup continued on Unit-2 until 1990, but it was too damaged to be rendered usable again. In the more than two decades since the accident at Three Mile Island, not a single new nuclear power plant has been ordered in the United States.
 
I remembered when this happened. It was a scary ordeal and was another hit to the public psyche at a time of generally low morale. It is unfortunate that it had the effect of halting further pursuit of nuclear power in this country.
 
A common misconception, AC

The US power generation business had overbuilt for the expected future demand, which didn't materialize. The recession (79-82) caused most of the power plants (of all kinds) being planned to be cancelled. TMI did cause a re-evaluation in the nuclear power industry, but it did not "kill the industry". The cost of borrowing large amounts of cash did. The nuclear fleet produces a lot more power today than it did in the 90's.

In the US, we are just getting serious about new generation today. There was a rash of natural gas plants build 8-10 years ago, and a few next generation coal plants are being completed today. The anticipated cost of a new plant is $8-18 billion, one reason the US government is involved with loan guarantees.
 
A common misconception, AC

The US power generation business had overbuilt for the expected future demand, which didn't materialize. The recession (79-82) caused most of the power plants (of all kinds) being planned to be cancelled. TMI did cause a re-evaluation in the nuclear power industry, but it did not "kill the industry". The cost of borrowing large amounts of cash did. The nuclear fleet produces a lot more power today than it did in the 90's.

In the US, we are just getting serious about new generation today. There was a rash of natural gas plants build 8-10 years ago, and a few next generation coal plants are being completed today. The anticipated cost of a new plant is $8-18 billion, one reason the US government is involved with loan guarantees.

Very true, but nuclear plants have a finite lifespan much more so than any other generation technology. If we had built more plants during that time frame wouldn't we be in a better situation now. Currently almost all of the money spent on nuclear power is on the decommissioning of older units and in the storage and disposal of waste. In my opinion, a little foresight in the past, even when demand was much lower would have left us in a better position with many more options today.

Interest rates in the late 70's and early 80's were very prohibitive to borrowing large sums of money, but there have been many strong economic periods since then when rates were very low and projects could have been completed. TMI may not be the sole cause of the US not building any new nuclear facilities since then, but I think it has played a significant role. The environmental movement in this country really cut its teeth on things like TMI and Love Canal and gained considerable lobbying power from them. Again, while not the only reason for our lack of building new facilities but certainly a significant factor.

New natural gas and low-emission coal plants are fine but both fall well short of the generation capacity of a nuclear plant.
 
Humans the world over seem incapable of safely handling nuke power-

WIKI- "In the period to 2007, sixty-three major nuclear accidents have occurred at nuclear power plants. Twenty-nine of these have occurred since the Chernobyl disaster, and 71 percent of all nuclear accidents (45 out of 63) occurred in the United States, challenging the notion that severe nuclear accidents cannot happen within the United States or that they have not happened since Chernobyl"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_and_radiation_accidents

LAND of the WOLVES- http://www.thefewgoodmen.com/thefgmforum/showthread.php?826-Land-of-the-Wolves
 
I believe that Nuclear power for Electricity and domestic use is the only way to go, with oil on it's way out, and coal being dirty as they put it, and of course we all know we are at the mercy of oil producing countries, which for me is just not good, as for wind turbines I don't think they are capable of satisfying the needs of this world.

We talk about accident's at these Nuc plants what about all the terrible accidents that have happened at the Mines, I think if you look at the casualties and compare they out way them a lot
 
Problem with nuke accidents is that they spread radiation over a wide area, for example after Chernobyl the winds carried the stuff as far as Sweden.
A Brit TV newscaster came up with a classic line just after Chernobyl, he said with a smile- "And now let's get the weather forecast, I think we'd all like to know which way the wind's blowing"
 
Problem with nuke accidents is that they spread radiation over a wide area, for example after Chernobyl the winds carried the stuff as far as Sweden.
A Brit TV newscaster came up with a classic line just after Chernobyl, he said with a smile- "And now let's get the weather forecast, I think we'd all like to know which way the wind's blowing"

Yes those fall out accidents do affect the enviroment, which really are bad, possible more concetration on safety must be the answer, and of course in any walk of life you can't be 100% on that, but honestly I can't see any other way of producing the power that the world needs...unless we say to hell with going GREEN and you know what..Let's have a nice coal fire
 
Yes, on the face of it, nuclear power seems simple enough and the answer to a dream, namely lumps of stuff glow red-hot forever so all we have to do is let them boil water to produce steam to power generators for cities, beats me why the operators keep botching up.
PS- i just found this map, most of Europe got zapped-

Cernobyl-mapB.gif
 
Then of course we have the question of Finance, there is so much money involved in the oil fuel industries in most countries, i wonder if the building of Nuc plant's is on hold because of this....And like human nature more so in the UK I think we will wait until the last moment, OH we better do some thing about this power cuts all over the place...Perhaps we should do some thing about this, i am being Cynical I know but looking on history we are famous for let' wait and see.

Once again Finance rears it's ugly head
 
I think Russia is still probably paying out to the hardest hit areas inside Russia first, then I suppose they'll look at other countries claims, the whole thing could take many years of legal wrangling in international law courts.

Chernobyl is in Ukraine
 
Back
Top Bottom