Fire & Rubble Tournament

Gunner

FGM Major
FGM MEMBER
Joined
Apr 16, 2013
Messages
4,477
Reaction score
3,117
Age
68
Location
Blue Point, New York
Noticing during a recent tournament where the Soviets did not seem to fare as well against the Germans as both the Common Wealth and the Americans did made me think of putting together a Fire & Rubble tournament to, besides pitting the best tactical CM minds against each other, kind of do a little test of force balance during Quick Battles.

I figure a minimum of 3 quick battle scenarios will be played, each on a specific map, a December ’44 small German probe on an open/village map, an April 45 Soviet Berlin attack and a late ’44 huge armor only meeting engagement.
(More QB's could be added. We could make the tournament 4 or 5 scenarios long depending on everyone's preference. The more games the better idea of balance.)

Players would play both sides in each battle against different opponents chosen at random for a total of 6 games played.

The goal would be to play 2 games against two different opponents simultaneously for a 3 round tournament.

Three quick battle scenarios played on three maps.
For each map a player will play two battles, one as the Germans and one as the Russians.

Right now the three maps will depict:
A Small German Probe with both sides Armored Infantry only on an Open-Village Map. (FR_Reitwein-880x880-Village-Open-Probe-01) probably December ’44, dawn, light snow, mist.
(This could change to a "Mixed" Probe if everyone would rather it that way.)

A Small Mixed (or maybe Infantry only) Russian Attack or Assault in Berlin City. (FR_Berlin Z West-480x480-City-Attack-01), April ’45 day.

A Huge Armor Only Meeting Engagement on an Open/Village Map. (FR_Batzlow-1520x1200-Village-Meeting-01), Late ’44 or early ’45. I would like to make all types of tanks available.
The huge armor QB is technically is not too huge. There aren’t many tanks you can buy that the points of a huge scenario can purchase, especially late in the war with big tanks. I wish I could double the points.
It would probably be a lot less units to control/move than the small QB’s.

Anyone interested or ideas?
 
@Gunner I think you did an excellent job with your Probes tourney a few years back. This sounds great, count me in!

Few ideas, maybe have some rules for the mix games, like nothing bigger than light tanks. Or maybe for the big armor battle could be in Berlin while allowing 100 pts for infantry or something. But even if you stick with all infantry I’m fine with that too.
 
I think rules for the big armor battle could also be useful depending on the rarity level you set
 
@Gunner I think you did an excellent job with your Probes tourney a few years back. This sounds great, count me in!

Few ideas, maybe have some rules for the mix games, like nothing bigger than light tanks. Or maybe for the big armor battle could be in Berlin while allowing 100 pts for infantry or something. But even if you stick with all infantry I’m fine with that too.

Right now there's only the one mixed game and that's the city battle.
I was thinking of making that all infantry only but had thoughts of the pictures from the Battle for Berlin with infantry moving from building to building and with tanks in the streets.
I think a mix would make a good QB city fight.

It's a point though, try battle?
Right now we have an Armored Infantry, a Mix and an All Armor scenario.
Should I add a fourth All Infantry battle say in a more wooded terrain?
I don't want to over do the length of the tournament.

I don't want to put in any restrictions, add or change anything that you can get in a normal quick battle just so we can kind of test the force balance that Battlefront gives us in the game.
 
I think rules for the big armor battle could also be useful depending on the rarity level you set

Thanks for brining up rarity level.
I was initially thinking no rarity just so you won't be restricted in what equipment you can use.
But I wonder if that would unbalance a scenario to favor one side or the other. It shouldn't though if BF did the points right (?)

Now I'm thinking Standard for the Armored Infantry, Loose for the Mix (I actually never played with "Loose" before) and None for the Armor.
 
Sounds interesting for sure!

Not 100% if it's wise for me to commit though, planning for a week or two holiday in October and the CMCW tournament among other things starting up soon.
 
Back
Top Bottom