TIK

I watched some of his videos. I like his attention to detail, but he's best when he analyses the number of tanks on each side etc. When he starts going into politics, I find his views quite naive and his arguments really thin.
 
Bulletpoint said:
I watched some of his videos. I like his attention to detail, but he's best when he analyses the number of tanks on each side etc. When he starts going into politics, I find his views quite naive and his arguments really thin.
Click to expand...
Roger that

But I don't pay much attention to that just to how it relates to its effect on the Strategies and Doctrine
 
He's fine when all he's doing is repeating Glantz, House, Tooze, etc. But as soon as he tries to do his own original "analysis", he goes off the rails and sometimes comes to some bizarre conclusions.

It's easy to suggest that he's fine on certain aspects, but the nonsense throws the other stuff into question.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom