Good-ol-Days

Weird times for sure, but I believe we can navigate our way through.
Thought I'd share my thoughts while having my morning coffee. :coffee:

These situations (and their solutions) are a bit complicated aren't they?
Many times the problem seems to be taking a 'good thing' too far, or oversimplifying things.
Take an article I read this morning (on the thunderbox - where I do some of my best research). :sneaky:

There's a hospital here which is embroiled in a big fight, essentially between 2 generations of doctors.
Some of the older generation of doctors are too aggressive, and many have been accused of bullying and harassment.
By the sounds of it, there were indeed some guys who were being extremely obnoxious and unprofessional.
They have come under scrutiny, and probably rightly so.

Remember all the publicity about the 'Hazing' of young trainees in the military and other professions/trades years ago?
No one should have to put up with that kind of bullshit for a job.

But there are other senior doctors and specialists who have been accused (seemingly by a minority) for quite minor stuff.
They too have been dragged into the gaping maw of 'human resources' - who are often just bureaucrats protecting the legal interests of their corporation.
Many are quitting rather than suffer the humiliation of trying to prove themselves innocent.

Take the protests against racism, in America and around the world at the moment.
My speculation is that 80% of people are genuinely trying to make positive change in the world.
Maybe 10% are way too aggressive and just looking for a fight.
5% are opportunistic looters who want to steal. 5% are provocateurs looking to push their shady agendas.
Many times it's the minority that get the media spotlight.

Plenty of examples of people taking things too far and vilifying all police - the very same 'paint everyone with erroneous assumptions' thing.
These problems in general seem to stem from a childish need to oversimplify; an all or nothing perception. It's more complex than that.

The last thing I want to mention is the concept of crybabies and 'safe spaces' and all that.
I've heard it mentioned many times...but I've never directly seen it in action.
I'm starting to think it may be an urban myth, or a fringe minority in certain cultures?
 
Last edited:
Here's the problem, at least in America. It used to be, before the advent of the internet, that a person was innocent until proven guilty. Now, a person's guilty until proven innocent, but even if they get proven innocent they are damaged goods, pretty much forever.

The current "stampede" is to defund the police, maybe even do away with them. The proponents of this say other "things" need to be put in place, but they don't know what exactly a society that does not have police would look like nor what the nebulous "things" to take the place of police are. So I have an idea. Let's give every police force 1 week off with pay, simultaneously. Then, if things are all licorice and lollipops after a week, I say go for it. Just give me some notice beforehand so I can stock up on ammo.
 
Plenty of examples of people taking things too far and vilifying all police - the very same 'paint everyone with erroneous assumptions' thing.
These problems in general seem to stem from a childish need to oversimplify; an all or nothing perception. It's more complex than that.
Indeed. However in a food for though category I heard some one point out that if the problem is a few bad apples then why does the system seem so incapable of getting rid of them? It kind of stopped me short actually.

I just heard about Camden NJ and it seems like a success story: https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/police-reform-ideas-united-states-george-floyd-1.5601990 I should read more though since I just heard about it yesterday.

The last thing I want to mention is the concept of crybabies and 'safe spaces' and all that.
I've heard it mentioned many times...but I've never directly seen it in action.
I'm starting to think it may be an urban myth, or a fringe minority in certain cultures?
Yep. Oh I think there are a few people who say that but litterally no one listens to them because it's utterly ridiculous.
 
Here's the problem, at least in America. It used to be, before the advent of the internet, that a person was innocent until proven guilty. Now, a person's guilty until proven innocent, but even if they get proven innocent they are damaged goods, pretty much forever.
Yeah I don't think so. Since we are talking about police lets use that as an example. Frequently when an office is actually dismissed form a force for bad behaviour (the few times that actually happens) they just get rehired in the next jurisdiction. Until a few weeks ago the majority of the time the MO was to hide behind due process to run out the clock on the public's attention and then quietly let bad actors who got caught off and shuffle them to another location.

The current "stampede" is to defund the police, maybe even do away with them. The proponents of this say other "things" need to be put in place, but they don't know what exactly a society that does not have police would look like nor what the nebulous "things" to take the place of police are.
Yeah, as one pundit said "if you have to explain it - you have lost already". This idea to defund the police is just not going anywhere. If anything happens to reform how police forces operate, manage complaints and conduct themselves it will be call something else. Having said that if you listen to the reasonable people who are calling for that they really are asking for pretty sensible reforms. Not the abolish crown - their just living in a rainbow unicorn land.

So I have an idea. Let's give every police force 1 week off with pay, simultaneously. Then, if things are all licorice and lollipops after a week, I say go for it. Just give me some notice beforehand so I can stock up on ammo.
Yeah, let's not do that. I don't think it will work out well. :D
 
Yeah I don't think so. Since we are talking about police lets use that as an example. Frequently when an office is actually dismissed form a force for bad behaviour (the few times that actually happens) they just get rehired in the next jurisdiction. Until a few weeks ago the majority of the time the MO was to hide behind due process to run out the clock on the public's attention and then quietly let bad actors who got caught off and shuffle them to another location.

Sounds exactly like what has been happening with pedo priests. Glad to see all that stuff and the institutional cover-ups being exposed. Utter corruption.

Yeah, as one pundit said "if you have to explain it - you have lost already". This idea to defund the police is just not going anywhere. If anything happens to reform how police forces operate, manage complaints and conduct themselves it will be call something else. Having said that if you listen to the reasonable people who are calling for that they really are asking for pretty sensible reforms. Not the abolish crown - their just living in a rainbow unicorn land.

I don't quite get this concept. Some snippets I've seen on the news talked about a partial defund, or even just a reduction in military equipment. Others seem to be presenting it as get rid of policing entirely (which obviously doesn't seem rational). Regardless, the idea of more funding to help struggling communities sounds positive (in any country). I can't recall the specifics, but I recall talk about education, social workers, youth centers and community projects like gardens.
 
I know that older folk always say it was much better in my younger day, I always use to smile and think it don't feel
that bad to me at the moment, you know some thing they were right things were much much better in my younger days.

View attachment 19373

Yeah, good old days of "smack 'em around a bit" -- slippery slope to institutional and systemic violence and abuse amongst law enforcement agencies against the poeple they are supposed to serve and protect... I know this was probably posted in jest and using an extreme stereotype of "crybaby social justice warrior"... maybe you should rather listen to the majority of a younger generation who maybe want make a better world (not to mention they will have to live with the climate and ecological (and someplaces economic) devastation our generation leaves behind) -- maybe slightly more free of sexual abuse, domestic violence, rape, gender discrimination and racism (systemic and otherwise) , economic injustices as aftermaths of the rapine of colonialism (even just starting by acknowledging they exist)... you may sneer at the extremists at one end or the other, but I admire the majority of these smart, younger generation who just want to make the world a better place -- and it's a messy process as these always are.
 
Weird times for sure, but I believe we can navigate our way through.
Thought I'd share my thoughts while having my morning coffee. :coffee:

These situations (and their solutions) are a bit complicated aren't they?
Many times the problem seems to be taking a 'good thing' too far, or oversimplifying things.
Take an article I read this morning (on the thunderbox - where I do some of my best research). :sneaky:

There's a hospital here which is embroiled in a big fight, essentially between 2 generations of doctors.
Some of the older generation of doctors are too aggressive, and many have been accused of bullying and harassment.
By the sounds of it, there were indeed some guys who were being extremely obnoxious and unprofessional.
They have come under scrutiny, and probably rightly so.

Remember all the publicity about the 'Hazing' of young trainees in the military and other professions/trades years ago?
No one should have to put up with that kind of bullshit for a job.

But there are other senior doctors and specialists who have been accused (seemingly by a minority) for quite minor stuff.
They too have been dragged into the gaping maw of 'human resources' - who are often just bureaucrats protecting the legal interests of their corporation.
Many are quitting rather than suffer the humiliation of trying to prove themselves innocent.

Take the protests against racism, in America and around the world at the moment.
My speculation is that 80% of people are genuinely trying to make positive change in the world.
Maybe 10% are way too aggressive and just looking for a fight.
5% are opportunistic looters who want to steal. 5% are provocateurs looking to push their shady agendas.
Many times it's the minority that get the media spotlight.

Plenty of examples of people taking things too far and vilifying all police - the very same 'paint everyone with erroneous assumptions' thing.
These problems in general seem to stem from a childish need to oversimplify; an all or nothing perception. It's more complex than that.

The last thing I want to mention is the concept of crybabies and 'safe spaces' and all that.
I've heard it mentioned many times...but I've never directly seen it in action.
I'm starting to think it may be an urban myth, or a fringe minority in certain cultures?

Well put -- and it's much harder work engaging with the nuances of these painful processes and deal with a changing world... than just switching back to a knee-jerk dismissive "get off my lawn grumpy old fart"response.

Same with the whole "statues debate"... statues themselves are not history -- they are political statements of their time (and those political statements and the context are the history)

... and times change and many a statue and monument has been torn down during times of change (French Revolution... the fall of communism in 80's for example)

Someone else summed it up more eloquently than I could:

Pull down the statues. Rename the streets. Revise the monuments. It's not erasing history. It's writing it in realtime.

We're not going to FORGET that Colston owned slaves. Or that Columbus enslaved indigenous Americans. Or that Leopold slaughtered millions of Congolese.

But maybe we'll REMEMBER when, in 2020, we decided it was time to stop thinking it's okay to give pride of place to these reminders of atrocities.
Because we've changed. What we think is acceptable has changed. And the places in which we live out our lives can change to match the world as
we think it ought to be, rather than incessantly reminding us of the world as it was for far too long.
 
Yeah I don't think so. Since we are talking about police lets use that as an example. Frequently when an office is actually dismissed form a force for bad behaviour (the few times that actually happens) they just get rehired in the next jurisdiction. Until a few weeks ago the majority of the time the MO was to hide behind due process to run out the clock on the public's attention and then quietly let bad actors who got caught off and shuffle them to another location.

My point was that in the internet age of social media, the court of public opinion is quick to assess blame but very slow to exonerate an innocent person.

Yeah, as one pundit said "if you have to explain it - you have lost already". This idea to defund the police is just not going anywhere. If anything happens to reform how police forces operate, manage complaints and conduct themselves it will be call something else. Having said that if you listen to the reasonable people who are calling for that they really are asking for pretty sensible reforms. Not the abolish crown - their just living in a rainbow unicorn land.

You know that and I know that, that is why I made my tongue in cheek suggestion. The reality is that if you get rid of a police force anarchy will be one step behind.

Yeah, let's not do that. I don't think it will work out well. :D

You think?

Let me make myself clear, I am in no way condoning police brutality on any level.

Do things need to change? Absolutely. However, the vehicles for betterment in the United States have been in place for at least 60 years, since LBJ's War on Poverty. The equation for upward social mobility in the United States is to get an education, present yourself in a positive manner and have a strong work ethic. Those that follow that simple equation, regardless of ethnic background, generally have a more comfortable lifestyle than those who do not. There are too many success stories of Americans of all creeds getting the education that is offered to all Americans, using that education ( there are educational benefits available, many geared toward those from economically disadvantaged groups) to start a career and through hard work attain a lifestyle that they have EARNED.

I am fearful that in the current climate that the American credo of what you have you EARN is being co-opted to what you have you TAKE from someone else because somehow it is owed to you, even though that person played the game( get an education, present themselves in a positive manner and work hard) and earned what they have.
 
Last edited:
I am fearful that in the current climate that the American credo of what you have you EARN is being co-opted to what you have you TAKE from someone else because somehow it is owed to you,

Watching from the outside I have no fear what so ever that that will happen. I realize that there are voices that say that - there have been for years. They get no traction. Having said that we might / I hope to see some changes to how services like education are offered to people so they *can* take advantage of them. Allowing people to follow the path of earning their way will make everyone better off.
 
Watching from the outside I have no fear what so ever that that will happen. I realize that there are voices that say that - there have been for years. They get no traction. Having said that we might / I hope to see some changes to how services like education are offered to people so they *can* take advantage of them. Allowing people to follow the path of earning their way will make everyone better off.

Maybe a shift from a dog-eat-dog-everyone-left-to-their-own-devices est up to a society and state that takes care of its poor, it's vulnerable ... it's still beyond me how a country as ostensibly rich like the USA cannot provide free healthcare for all its citizens like just about every other developed country can (to varying degrees of success) ... even we here in a marginal 3rd world "shithole"country, to quote a certain Prez, are aspiring to one day achieve that.
 
Maybe a shift from a dog-eat-dog-everyone-left-to-their-own-devices est up to a society and state that takes care of its poor, it's vulnerable ... it's still beyond me how a country as ostensibly rich like the USA cannot provide free healthcare for all its citizens like just about every other developed country can (to varying degrees of success) ... even we here in a marginal 3rd world "shithole"country, to quote a certain Prez, are aspiring to one day achieve that.
“Free healthcare” isn’t free, at least to me. Please refer to it a “Taxpayer funded healthcare“
 
Yeah, good old days of "smack 'em around a bit" -- slippery slope to institutional and systemic violence and abuse amongst law enforcement agencies against the poeple they are supposed to serve and protect... I know this was probably posted in jest and using an extreme stereotype of "crybaby social justice warrior"... maybe you should rather listen to the majority of a younger generation who maybe want make a better world (not to mention they will have to live with the climate and ecological (and someplaces economic) devastation our generation leaves behind) -- maybe slightly more free of sexual abuse, domestic violence, rape, gender discrimination and racism (systemic and otherwise) , economic injustices as aftermaths of the rapine of colonialism (even just starting by acknowledging they exist)... you may sneer at the extremists at one end or the other, but I admire the majority of these smart, younger generation who just want to make the world a better place -- and it's a messy process as these always are.
I know what you are saying, The criminal element back in the 40s and 50s did respect the police meaning if they got caught most times went peacefully, now a days all they want to do is beat the police up, as you know the UK police don't carry firearms they are available if called for, when I was a growing up in London as young boy we would hide from a policeman if we saw one we would freeze on the spot, the violence that goes on now as been created more so as time goes by into the modern day version of life, My growing up in London was far better the the Gangs and drug dealers, I loved London when I lived there, I wouldn't go back now for all the Tea in China
 
things were much much better in my younger days.
Well one of many good things today - awesome we can have a chat together from all around the world, on the internet. Seemed space-age in the 80's.
Wouldn't mind having a beer with you guys in person though...party at Hedgehog's house! ;) :cheerso:

 
Last edited:
My point was that in the internet age of social media, the court of public opinion is quick to assess blame but very slow to exonerate an innocent person.



You know that and I know that, that is why I made my tongue in cheek suggestion. The reality is that if you get rid of a police force anarchy will be one step behind.



You think?

Let me make myself clear, I am in no way condoning police brutality on any level.

Do things need to change? Absolutely. However, the vehicles for betterment in the United States have been in place for at least 60 years, since LBJ's War on Poverty. The equation for upward social mobility in the United States is to get an education, present yourself in a positive manner and have a strong work ethic. Those that follow that simple equation, regardless of ethnic background, generally have a more comfortable lifestyle than those who do not. There are too many success stories of Americans of all creeds getting the education that is offered to all Americans, using that education ( there are educational benefits available, many geared toward those from economically disadvantaged groups) to start a career and through hard work attain a lifestyle that they have EARNED.

I am fearful that in the current climate that the American credo of what you have you EARN is being co-opted to what you have you TAKE from someone else because somehow it is owed to you, even though that person played the game( get an education, present themselves in a positive manner and work hard) and earned what they have.
Pretty much sums up how I feel.
 
The reality is that if you get rid of a police force anarchy will be one step behind.
I am daily viewer of the Tucker Carlson show and what I have sawn there regarding the occupied area in Seattle (Chaz "Nation") is very concerning. If you replace the regular police then self-declared and partisan "security forces and warlords will replace it. Not good. The utopians can be very dangerous and the dystopia is always near if the utopians try to implement their ideas.
 
Back
Top Bottom