EMPIRE BUILDERS: Field of Glory 2 Medieval Campaign - COMPLETED!!
- Thread starter Rico
- Start date
That was quick! Excellent work, Magister Militum!
Yeah, those Byzantine armies can so easily go either way...LOL.
@Wellsonian , Magister Militum of the WHITE Empire is victorious and captures ANATOLIA.
1. NORWAY - Red attack from Denmark - @Nathangun (Danish 1200-1319) vs @Alpha Zwo (Norwegian 1155-1319)
2. ANATOLIA - White attack from Constantinople - @Wellsonian (Arabs (Syria/Iraq) 890-1008 AD) vs @Badger73 (Byzantine 988 - 1041 AD) - WHITE VICTORY (+35%)
3. ENGLAND - Blue attack from Scotland - @HOA_KSOP (Anglo-Saxon 950-1016 AD) vs @ Rico (Scots 851-1051 AD AD vs ) - Wolves At The Gate
4. GRANADA - Green attack from Gascony - @Mad Mike French (1155-1319) vs @ Rico (Berber (Almohad) 1121-1269)
1. NORWAY - Red attack from Denmark - @Nathangun (Danish 1200-1319) vs @Alpha Zwo (Norwegian 1155-1319)
2. ANATOLIA - White attack from Constantinople - @Wellsonian (Arabs (Syria/Iraq) 890-1008 AD) vs @Badger73 (Byzantine 988 - 1041 AD) - WHITE VICTORY (+35%)
3. ENGLAND - Blue attack from Scotland - @HOA_KSOP (Anglo-Saxon 950-1016 AD) vs @ Rico (Scots 851-1051 AD AD vs ) - Wolves At The Gate
4. GRANADA - Green attack from Gascony - @Mad Mike French (1155-1319) vs @ Rico (Berber (Almohad) 1121-1269)
Last edited:
Battle for ENGLAND.
My Scots managed to rout most of the Anglo-Saxon cavalry that charged forward a bit impetuously... my right wing hanging on against the enemy Huscarl's assault.
@HOA_KSOP was originally hunkered down on that impressive hill ... but seeing he is the attacker, he had to come down and fight to force a result.
In GRANADA, I have Almohad Camel Lancers in action against mounted knights on the only hill on the map...LOL ... they're holding their own -- alas, same can't be said for the rest of my army so far. (they have a good force mix, but I don't think I am using them right.)
@Nathangun @Alpha Zwo How go the battle for NORWAY?
My Scots managed to rout most of the Anglo-Saxon cavalry that charged forward a bit impetuously... my right wing hanging on against the enemy Huscarl's assault.
@HOA_KSOP was originally hunkered down on that impressive hill ... but seeing he is the attacker, he had to come down and fight to force a result.
In GRANADA, I have Almohad Camel Lancers in action against mounted knights on the only hill on the map...LOL ... they're holding their own -- alas, same can't be said for the rest of my army so far. (they have a good force mix, but I don't think I am using them right.)
@Nathangun @Alpha Zwo How go the battle for NORWAY?
Last edited:
Facing off with archers, within charging distance of each other. It's a case of who blinks first. Will post screenie next turn.
The heralds arrive bearing the latest news from the battle fields! ... the battle ended quite suddenly, and the WHITE Empire holds on to ENGLAND, fending off the second BLUE Empire incursion! End result: 40% - 12% = +28%
1. NORWAY - Red attack from Denmark - @Nathangun (Danish 1200-1319) vs @Alpha Zwo (Norwegian 1155-1319)
2. ANATOLIA - White attack from Constantinople - @Wellsonian (Arabs (Syria/Iraq) 890-1008 AD) vs @Badger73 (Byzantine 988 - 1041 AD) - WHITE VICTORY (+35%)
3. ENGLAND - Blue attack from Scotland - @HOA_KSOP (Anglo-Saxon 950-1016 AD) vs @ Rico (Scots 851-1051 AD AD vs ) - WHITE VICTORY (+28%)
4. GRANADA - Green attack from Gascony - @Mad Mike French (1155-1319) vs @ Rico (Berber (Almohad) 1121-1269)
Who will blink first?
Very neat flanking maneuver...Who will blink first?
The battle for GRANADA is over and the region stays with the WHITE Empire -- good battle, @Mad Mike -- his French infantry held the initial advantage demolishing my left wing, but somehow the fight swung around and his French knights on other wing got tangled up with my lighter cavalry, spearmen and the very impressive Berber Camel Lancers.
1. NORWAY - Red attack from Denmark - @Nathangun (Danish 1200-1319) vs @Alpha Zwo (Norwegian 1155-1319)
2. ANATOLIA - White attack from Constantinople - @Wellsonian (Arabs (Syria/Iraq) 890-1008 AD) vs @Badger73 (Byzantine 988 - 1041 AD) - WHITE VICTORY (+35%)
3. ENGLAND - Blue attack from Scotland - @HOA_KSOP (Anglo-Saxon 950-1016 AD) vs @ Rico (Scots 851-1051 AD AD vs ) - WHITE VICTORY (+28%)
4. GRANADA - Green attack from Gascony - @Mad Mike French (1155-1319) vs @ Rico (Berber (Almohad) 1121-1269) - WHITE VICTORY (+25%)
1. NORWAY - Red attack from Denmark - @Nathangun (Danish 1200-1319) vs @Alpha Zwo (Norwegian 1155-1319)
2. ANATOLIA - White attack from Constantinople - @Wellsonian (Arabs (Syria/Iraq) 890-1008 AD) vs @Badger73 (Byzantine 988 - 1041 AD) - WHITE VICTORY (+35%)
3. ENGLAND - Blue attack from Scotland - @HOA_KSOP (Anglo-Saxon 950-1016 AD) vs @ Rico (Scots 851-1051 AD AD vs ) - WHITE VICTORY (+28%)
4. GRANADA - Green attack from Gascony - @Mad Mike French (1155-1319) vs @ Rico (Berber (Almohad) 1121-1269) - WHITE VICTORY (+25%)
Yep, never underestimate those Camels .. they moderately disorder their mounted opponents next to them, which can be a good advantage.
Poison their wells and slaughter their livestock and burn their granaries...? Just saying...Hmm, the WHITES are running rampant. Something should be done . . . .
Poison their wells and slaughter their livestock and burn their granaries...? Just saying...
Chevauchée
A chevauchée was a raiding method of medieval warfare for weakening the enemy, primarily by burning and pillaging enemy territory in order to reduce the productivity of a region, as opposed to siege warfare or wars of conquest.I don't have that FOG 2 mod... is it out yet?
Blue, you need to accept the fact that you are already dead.
That’s our plan, lull you into over confidence, then destroy you. Of course @Badger73 is handicapped by being paired with me....
Well, you’re doing a helluva job infusing us with confidence then.
It's still tight, could go either way.
