To get it started I would suggest the following:
The two OC's will set up a meeting engagement on a medium map (096 meet, medium agriculture with 45 minutes).
Each side can spent in total 1500 points for a Battalion(-), with 2 companies. The OC's will buy the troops.
Players:
OC for the Allied side is @PhilM
OC for the Axis side is @Rik_atc
FC A Company is @Gunner (edit: replaced by @Buckykatt)
FC B Company is @fivefivesix
FC 1. Kompanie @JP48 (edit: confirmed)
FC 2. Kompanie @Kraut (edit confirmed)
Reserve FC is @Buckykatt (edit: now FC A Company)
(Edit: the new reserve player is: @Gunner)
Gentlemen, please let me know if we can proceed as described above.
Not yet, Sir. I assumed you had already spoken with him about this?Looks OK for me as well. Did you get a confirmation from @Rik_atc for his participation?
If I remember correctly you Sir did not like (as I also do) overcrowded QB, therefore I decided that only 1500 points can be spend in this medium QB map, which would normally allow to spent 2850 points in this size meeting engagement.Yep, good for me.
Not material for a trial: but if, hopefully, we proceed to a second bigger, longer battle then I would hope for NOT a QB Meeting type battle ... the multi-player aspects may well mean it turns out differently, but I have a long-held dislike of CM QB Meeting type, they always seem the least realistic starting points ... two sides, supposedly in ignorance of each other’s presence, rushing to get to and take the one single central VL ... when of course in game we know the other one is there, and just happens to have a same points total force as you do ... but perhaps that’s just me!
Much prefer some sort of asymmetric start point, with victory expectations adjusted accordingly ...
Not yet, Sir. I assumed you had already spoken with him about this?
If he can not participate, then I will play Axis OC and the reserve player @Gunner the 1. Kompanie, or @Gunner takes the Axis OC and I remain in command of 1. Kompanie.
If I remember correctly you Sir did not like (as I also do) overcrowded QB, therefore I decided that only 1500 points can be spend in this medium QB map, which would normally allow to spent 2850 points in this size a meeting engagement.
I hope all players can agree with that. In my opinion I would like to start and produce experience with this kind of multiplayer battle. Then we can adjust rules and setting for the next (bigger) battles.
Then it is a communication misunderstanding. What has been the reason for the nomination?I have not spoken to @Rik_atc. He was just a nomination...
We have had only 5 players until today and only one OC (@PhilM ).With apologies, this is probably going to seem rude (perhaps it is ...), but has the other OC even taken part in this thread yet?
The tag doesn’t seem familiar to me ... no disqualification of course, and I don’t object ... but I thought that we’d had others who’d expressed an interest?
If this is out of line, I apologise ... happy to just kick things off as suggested.
You are doing fine @Kraut it needs some time. This is not as easy as a tournament as its not to everyone’s liking. Need to be patient we will get everybody on board. @Hardradi could be an OC as well, not sure if he’s up to it though. He would do a fine job. I would also suggest @Wellsonian @MeatEtr or @Meat Grinder although MG has a weird scheduleThen it is a communication misunderstanding. What has been the reason for the nomination?
We have had only 5 players until today and only one OC (@PhilM ).
@Gunner wrote he wanted to play FC, but only if his unit size is not above one company.
Did I forget someone?
One takeaway for me so far is that I find it difficult to coordinate this and to achieve a consensus. Maybe I lack experience setting this up, or bad leadership.
Is there are a fellow member who would like to supersede the coordination?
Definitely NOT bad leadership, I agree that you are doing great. My comments defn not meant as a criticism of you, getting people to agree on anything is like herding cats ...Then it is a communication misunderstanding. What has been the reason for the nomination?
We have had only 5 players until today and only one OC (@PhilM ).
@Gunner wrote he wanted to play FC, but only if his unit size is not above one company.
Did I forget someone?
One takeaway for me so far is that I find it difficult to coordinate this and to achieve a consensus. Maybe I lack experience setting this up, or bad leadership.
Is there are a fellow member who would like to supersede the coordination?
To get it started I would suggest the following:
The two OC's will set up a meeting engagement on a medium map (096 meet, medium agriculture with 45 minutes).
Each side can spent in total 1500 points for a Battalion(-), with 2 companies. The OC's will buy the troops.
Players:
OC for the Allied side is @PhilM (edit: confirmed)
OC for the Axis side is @Rik_atc
FC A Company is @Gunner (edit: replaced by @Buckykatt confirmed)
FC B Company is @fivefivesix
FC 1. Kompanie @JP48 (edit: confirmed)
FC 2. Kompanie @Kraut (edit confirmed)
Reserve FC is @Buckykatt (edit: now FC A Company)
(Edit: the new reserve player is: @Gunner)
Gentlemen, please let me know if we can proceed as described above.
I have a long-held dislike of CM QB Meeting type, they always seem the least realistic starting points ... two sides, supposedly in ignorance of each other’s presence, rushing to get to and take the one single central VL ... when of course in game we know the other one is there, and just happens to have a same points total force as you do ... but perhaps that’s just me!
CMFII have not finished the reading but, one question guys, which game are we playing this?