- Joined
- Dec 26, 2015
- Messages
- 2,220
- Reaction score
- 1,669
- Location
- Ontario, Canada
- Website
- www.lesliesoftware.com
I would play either side.
Yeah I missed this as well. Asking players to do 3 battles per Rd at a time is a bit much. Would be more player-friendly to do 3 Rds with 2 battles a piece.So everyone is playing 3 matches at the same time?
No, the plan is to play the battles one at a time. However, I am considering whether players should be allowed to play more than one battle at a time, if they wish to do soSo everyone is playing 3 matches at the same time?
Ok!No, the plan is to play the battles one at a time. However, I am considering whether players should be allowed to play more than one battle at a time, if they wish to do so
Thanks for the reply.Every player is expected to play in all three battles of a round, so every player will have to play a maximum of 8 battles in the whole tournament
So the time limit is 39 days per round, not per game. Each round is three battles so assuming each game goes the full 30 turns that is 3x30÷39=2.3 turns per day or 16 turns per week.The time limit (real time) per round is 39 days.
The tournament consists of two regular rounds with three battles each and, if necessary, a tie-break round with two battles.
I consider to switch the time frame from 39 DAYS PER BATTLE (@Bremer dan Gorst) to 117 days per round (1 ROUND = 3 BATTLES, @Bremer dan Gorst). but the players can complete the 3 BATTLES OF ONE ROUND (@Bremer dan Gorst) parallel or one after another, whatever time allows.I have to go on an exercise for 3 weeks at the end of october. Would that be a problem?
See above. The time frame for ONE BATTLE was originally considered 39 days, with each battle fought one after another, = 117 days for three battles.Ok, I'm confused
Cut and pasted from the rules pdf:
So the time limit is 39 days per round, not per game. Each round is three battles so assuming each game goes the full 30 turns that is 3x30÷39=2.3 turns per day or 16 turns per week.
FWIW I think the 39days per battle is better. Just because it's difficult to look ahead 117 days and know you and the other players have to be available daily in sync at the same time to play the games. Some will want to play 3 at the same time, some won't.I consider to switch the time frame from 39 DAYS PER BATTLE (@Bremer dan Gorst) to 117 days per round (1 ROUND = 3 BATTLES, @Bremer dan Gorst). but the players can complete the 3 BATTLES OF ONE ROUND (@Bremer dan Gorst) parallel or one after another, whatever time allows.
See above. The time frame for ONE BATTLE was originally considered 39 days, with each battle fought one after another, = 117 days for three battles.
Ok. I'm back in then.I consider to switch the time frame from 39 DAYS PER BATTLE (@Bremer dan Gorst) to 117 days per round (1 ROUND = 3 BATTLES, @Bremer dan Gorst). but the players can complete the 3 BATTLES OF ONE ROUND (@Bremer dan Gorst) parallel or one after another, whatever time allows.
See above. The time frame for ONE BATTLE was originally considered 39 days, with each battle fought one after another, = 117 days for three battles.