My wife and I play this fun game during quarantine.
It's called "Why are you doing it that way?" and there are no winners.
It's called "Why are you doing it that way?" and there are no winners.
The spread of COVID19 is more wide spread than SARS not because of a particular government move but the way the virus acts. SARS is deadlier but harder to catch (not hard, just harder than COVID19). So, my comment on China doing better was based on them being more open with information *after* the outbreak was known than they were with SARS. Clearly that's a low bar - I didn't mean to say they did anything like a good job after all they still tried to pretend it wasn't real at all and hurt their own citizens because of it and they have clearly revered to sending out a lot of BS since.
I was listening to a researcher who said these kinds of respiratory viruses are worse (for us) if they like to live deep in our lungs but they don't spread as easily because there is less virus available in the upper respiratory tract to get coughed up. Things like colds are easy to spread but stay high up in our respiratory tract so very few people die from them. COVID19 and the flu like to be deeper in so they are dangerous but not as deep as SARS. I don't have a source that I can link - I forget what show it was on or who the Dr was. It makes some sense so I'm kinda using it as my mental model for now.
Yeah and that's a issue. The bad actions of China are all over that. Remember the WHO representative who stopped an interview becasue he was asked about the status of Taiwan. That's insane. China used $ and some whiley diplomacy to fuck that organization up. We (collectively) need to un-fuck it and take steps to stop that kind of nonsense from China. IHMO.
LOL yep. But that paper you are referring to is only making the claim that there are virus particles that linger in the air for longer than we first thought. Researchers knew early on that the virus is spread from droplets from our speech, cough etc. The way it works for flu, for example, as I'm sure you know, is that people cough and get droplets on their hands and touch door handles etc and the droplets fall on counter tops and then someone else comes along and touches those surfaces. Obviously if some dumb-ass with the flu coughs in your face you can skip the touching surfaces step .
Those modes of transmission have been well under stood for a long time for other viruses and quickly were recognized as the way COVID19 spread too. The paper you are referring to really just says: "hey we keep thinking this virus is not present in the smallest droplets we emit when we breath but we see otherwise". Really what that paper is saying is that they believe they have shown that COVID19 does get delivered in those smallest droplets that can float in the air for a while. As with all things science that was one study and more people need to verify the same results. But it does put more weight to the argument that people should be wearing masks because it cuts down on the number of particles that we eject of all sizes.
LOL - yep again. Some of the early work on virus survival showed lots of variation based on the type of surface and the temperature. But the thing is in any situation where we can live and walk around that time was never really short the shortest I remember reading about for conditions or surfaces that we live in was 24 hours.
Recycling in 2019:
- I'm not an alcoholic! Ha, ha. I just had a party.
Recycling in 2020:
- OMG I swear I didn't have a party! I'm an alcoholic.
So I saw in the wee hours this morning that experts are saying the virus is probably being circulated by air conditioning and they are recommending running Your air conditioner with the windows open.
I will go back through my history and see if I can find it. Might be tonight before I get to it.That is something I have not heard. Do you still remember where you read / heard it?
https://news.yahoo.com/turn-off-air-conditioning-experts-095902288.htmlThat is something I have not heard. Do you still remember where you read / heard it?
Thanks, I really appreciate it. Looks like it came originally from The Telegraph which is I think is a UK paper. Which I don't really have an opinion on personally. The concern I have is the experts they talked to are AC experts. So, if you say to them we have established that disease XYZ is air born what should we do with our AC they are qualified to comment. I issue I have is the extent to which we actually have to worry about droplets of Covid19 flying around for a long time.https://news.yahoo.com/turn-off-air-conditioning-experts-095902288.html
Keep in mind it was posted on Yahoo News, not the most objective of sources...LOL
I hear ya it is an issue. Also don't forget the old phrase "never attribute to malice what can be adequately explained by incompetence". Yeah I am talking about reporters and especially headline writers. That factors in too. I think what you did is the way to go - read it and see the problems that the reporter either glossed over or was to rushed or too ignorant to see.These are two examples of why I never trust the media. They are propaganda organs for someone, because the media's implication is the current administration is somehow responsible for "healthy" Americans (and I use that term SARCASTICALLY") being laid low by the virus.