Enjoying this AAR
@Drifter Man and reading it up and down. Very generous.I appreciated the groups observations. Most instructive. Thanks all. I am KGBoy. I am either shy or cagey -- not sure which...
@Drifter Man Is this being played on IRON?
Stafford's tactics are most revealing about approaching ME's. Clearly Hill 36 was his goal. The 1-2 punch was the aircraft and the Humber III et al to hold you up. I really felt your disappointment about the aircraft and the rationalizing it entailed -- interesting.
As to the plausibility of random aircraft just 'appearing' I would have to say (were I an arbitrator) this was preplanned and the proof was the Humber III's rumbling death wish. One came with a two -- a left and a right. The result was a perfect denial of Hill 36 for the Germans. Very clever. Stafford knows a thing or 2!
I hope this is not out of line. But I feel this is about gameplay rules and so open for discussion.
And I thought you were "Kampfgruppe Boy". Welcome here.
It is played on Elite. I suggested to Stafford before the game that we select Elite because Iron is basically just an UI obstacle that can prevent you from readily seeing some of your own units. In a battle this big this could become a pain. As it turned out, Stafford is not a fan of Iron either.
He did deny Hill 36 to me, but even worse - I had not even wanted Hill 36 until I realized that it is important to him - and that was too late. This was a mistake, but an even greater mistake was putting the StuGs in full view and keeping them there for so long. In the absence of other decent hull down positions on this flank, I should have either taken Hill 36 (the South Ridge would have given me hull down positions) - or left the flank open and defend it further to the rear.
About the preplanned airstrikes, yes I think it was a bit cheap, basically like dropping artillery right outside (in fact inside) the setup zone in the opening turns of the battle. Just different means of delivery. Of course I had to be there and of course the planes had plenty of targets. But in the end these strikes did not cost me too much - apart from the immobilized StuG.
On the other hand, this latest air-armor cooperation was a brilliant move on Stafford's part. After the air attack, I had two options for the remaining two StuGs: 1) stay and fight and risk having them both disabled by the plane, after which they would be easily taken out by the tanks, 2) disperse and hope to save at least one. I realized that Stafford has the option to attack with his tanks while I am trying to get them to cover, which would make them unable to shoot back. But fighting while under attack from the air did not seem to give me much hope to hit anything anyway, so I chose to disperse.
In the end, the plane did not come back, which I didn't even consider possible. Stafford's tanks nailed one StuG with ease and I was fortunate to get the other one out. In retrospect, the better decision would have been to stay and fight - both StuGs would probably have ended up destroyed in a 2-on-4 to 2-on-6 fight but at least there would have been a fight.
And back to the Humbers... it was really only one of them, in the center, that slowed me down, although I am unsure now whether it really changed anything. I am still wondering whether the suicide action of the first Humber, which laid a smoke screen blinding my StuG covering this approach, was intentional (with a pop smoke command given in the perfect place), or if it was just a fluke that the Humber crew spotted the threat right there and chose to drop smoke on their own.
Stafford's busy at work and so am I, so we slowed down, but I'll do my best to keep this thread updated!