Only one?This should get me through to the end of the lock down.
---
![]()
Only one?This should get me through to the end of the lock down.
---
![]()
The epicenter of the second plague being Congress...
Ah, well that pretty much sums up the majority of non accidental deaths. The mortality for the Flu is still something we can calculate. In fact if you look for it you often find that they quite flu plus pneumonia deaths together since they often go hand in hand.Hmmmm, the CDC has announced that in 94% of COVID deaths there were underlying medical conditions that contributed significantly to the severity of the disease and led to the death of the patient. Given that COVID is being attributed to deaths that aren't necessarily caused by COVID, we will never know the "true" mortality rate.
LOL yeah that's a dumb statistical anomaly for sure. The thing is even if such things are even slightly common it pales in comparison with the under counting that is the real problem. When the US death tole attributed to Covid19 was at 150 000 the actual number of deaths that were higher than the average for this time period for the past few years was 200 000 deaths. So, even if a large number of those additional 50 000 deaths are indirect (people who die of an OD because they are alone instead of with people or die of a hear attack because they didn't go to the hospital soon enough for example) that still dwarfs the number of people who die by accident who happened to have tested positive for Covid 19.For example, my brother-in-law related to me that a gentleman he worked with tested COVID positive, but was killed in an automobile accident. His cause of death.? You guessed it, COVID 19.
Because the basic rule is "anyone who dies and has tested positive for covid19 is counted as a covid91 death". Clearly an accident that was not caused by the disease shouldn't count. I think I made the point that even with these kinds of things it is just noise in the stats not a real problem with the status. We are already under counting people who died as a result of covid19 far more than any goofy reporting rule problem like this."... His cause of death.? You guessed it, COVID 19."
Really? How do we verify that kind of stupid?
Under counting how?Because the basic rule is "anyone who dies and has tested positive for covid19 is counted as a covid91 death". Clearly an accident that was not caused by the disease shouldn't count. I think I made the point that even with these kinds of things it is just noise in the stats not a real problem with the status. We are already under counting people who died as a result of covid19 far more than any goofy reporting rule problem like this.
Because the basic rule is "anyone who dies and has tested positive for covid19 is counted as a covid91 death".
Because someone has an agenda?But shouldn't the actual cause of death be counted as the cause of death? I think other things can be listed as secondary or contributing.
As an example many men get prostrate cancer. Many of these men will actually die of heart attacks etc after they have tested positive for prostrate cancer. But the death certificate lists the cause of death as a heart attack (or that fancy medical phrase they use for heart attacks). Why is it different for Covid?
LOL yeah that's a dumb statistical anomaly for sure.
Look around, then re-think that question...LOLReally? How do we verify that kind of stupid?